Assessment of sustainable aviation fuel production methods using a hybridized decision-making framework
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2024
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) present a feasible solution to decarbonize modern aviation. Unlike traditional jet fuels, SAFs are produced in a variety of ways, thereby choosing one of these processes is a complicated Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) challenge that involves conflicting priorities. This study evaluates SAF production processes using a multicriteria methodology, PROMETHEE II. With SAF technology in its nascent stage and limited data, several stakeholders in the aviation sector were enlisted to assist in the collection of data and preferences. The suggested framework’s strength lies in its adaptability to suit the subjective opinions of diverse stakeholders, selection of a ranking system, and robustness of outcomes. This research engaged stakeholders in a participatory manner to rank 11 (A1 to A11) SAF production paths based on 24 parameters categorized into social, environmental, economic, and technological evaluation criteria. Industry professionals were given a form to rate SAF production methods according to a performance criterion. Data is validated using fuzzy TOPSIS, fuzzy VIKOR, and PROMETHEE II to reduce professionals’ judgmental personal prejudice. Results indicate the optimal feedstock for SAF production is the direct transition process of CO2 to SAF (A11) in the gasification or Fischer-T synthesis group.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Aviation, Green Fuel, Sustainable Aviation Fuel, PROMETHEE II, Bio Fuels
Kaynak
Journal of Turkish Operations Management
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
8
Sayı
1
Künye
Ibrahim, I. T., Kuşakcı, A. O. ve Abdullah, A. (2024). Assessment of sustainable aviation fuel production methods using a hybridized decision-making framework. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, 8(1), 241-268. https://doi.org/10.56554/jtom.1406562