Açıkgenç, Alparslan
Yükleniyor...
Araştırma projeleri
Organizasyon Birimleri
İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü
Bölüm, uluslararası standartlarda nitelikli bilgi üretmeyi, özellikle İslam felsefesi, Türk düşüncesi ve fenomenoloji geleneğini merkeze almayı ve bu meyanda felsefi bilgi üretilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Batı'da gelişen felsefenin soy kütüğünde sadece Yunan, Helenistik ve Hıristiyan değil, İslam felsefi mirası da yer almaktadır.
Adı Soyadı
Alparslan Açıkgenç
İlgi Alanları
History of Philosophy
Kurumdaki Durumu
Aktif Personel
2 sonuçlar
Arama Sonuçları
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Yayın Comparative theories and methods between uniplexity and multiplexity(İbn Haldun Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2020) Şentürk, Recep; Açıkgenç, Alparslan; Küçükural, Önder; Yamamoto, Qayyim Naoki; Keskin Aksay, Nursem; Özalkan, Seda; Asadov, Ayaz; Naeem, Danish; Belkız, Evren; Faytre, Leonard; Taiai, Maria; Noorata, Metin; Kırkarlar, Osman; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Sosyoloji BölümüThis work is intended to be a textbook for the fundamentals of theoriesand methods in the social sciences and the humanities. Along with theknowledge of the existing theories and methods, this book will provide theanalytical tools that will help the reader comprehend the hidden assumptionsand philosophical underpinnings from a comparative and critical perspective.More precisely, this book aims to introduce not only theories and methods butalso the worldviews from which they emerge and the paradigms that they arerooted in. Crystallizing the ontological, epistemological and methodologicalcategories in mind, this book will also help the reader be consistent in researchquestions, methods and conclusions...Yayın Being and existence and Sandra and Heidegger: A comparative ontology(İbn Haldun Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2020) Açıkgenç, AlparslanThe present work was completed in 1982 at the University of Chicago as part of the author’s PhD requirements; then in 1993 it was revised and published in Kuala Lumpur by the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC). Since then there have been many studies on both Mull? ?adr? and Heidegger. The purpose of this edition is not to incorporate these recent studies because I do not think that they change the general arguments in this old study. They, however, add more comprehension to the themes discussed in this work. I would like to add one of my insights here by way of passing which I had felt in fact when I was working on my thesis. The readers may also notice in this study that some sentences of Heidegger seem to be German translations of ?adr?’s statements. The general context of these statements are quite different from the statements of ?adr? and thus they do not somehow lead to the conclusion that these are taken from Max Horten’s (d. 1945) book Das Philosophische System von Schiräzi: Übersetzt und Erläutert which is published in 1913. For instance, Heidegger defines time as “the horizon of Being” (for this see the first part of Sein und Zeit entitled “Die Interpretation des Daseins auf die Zeitlichkeit und die Explikation der Zeit als des transzendentalen Horizontes der Frage nach dem Sein”) which is the same in ?adr?. Moreover, they both affirm that knowledge is a mode of Being (see here Conclusion, section 5). These are introduced as main parallel ideas. I think this is what makes a comparative study of Heidegger and ?adr? interesting and worthwhile...
