Yanık, Medaim

Profil fotoğrafı
 E-posta Adresi
medaim.yanik@ihu.edu.tr
ORCID Profili
0000-0001-5936-0017
WoS Profili
CGF-0870-2022
Scopus Profili
55585938100
YÖK Araştırmacı Profili
0B4045F11A532189
Google Akademik Profili
qmWleLsAAAAJ&hl
TR-Dizin Profili
251506
SOBİAD Profili
12307
Web Sitesi
akademik.ihu.edu.tr/tr/medaim-yanik

Araştırma projeleri

Organizasyon Birimleri

Organizasyon Birimi Logosu
Organizasyon Birimi
İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü
Psikoloji Bölümü BSc, MA, MSc ve PhD dereceleri sunmaktadır ve bu çalışma alanları gelişmektedir. Psikoloji biliminin ele aldığı konular, beynin işlevlerinden toplumsal hareketlerin incelenmesine, çocuk gelişiminden ruhsal bozuklukların nasıl tedavi edilebileceğine kadar uzanan çok geniş bir yelpazede yer alır. Bu zenginlik, psikolojinin birçok farklı, ancak birbiriyle etkileşim içinde olan alt alanlarının bulunduğu anlamına gelmektedir.

Adı Soyadı

Medaim Yanık

İlgi Alanları

Psikiyatri, Eş Terapileri, Disosiyatif Kimlik Bozukluğu

Kurumdaki Durumu

Aktif Personel

Filtreler

20191
Filtreleri Sıfırla

Ayarlar

Konu: Satisfaction ×

Arama Sonuçları

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
  • Küçük Resim
    Yayın
    Satisfaction and attitude of bipolar patients regarding electroconvulsive therapy: Modified or unmodified
    (Taylor & Francis, 2019) Canbek Atay, Özge; Bağ, Sevda; Usta, Haluk; Çetinkaya, Esin; Yanık, Medaim; Yanık, Medaim; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü
    Objective: Ministry of Health of Turkey issued a legislation to use only modified electroconvulsivetherapy (ECT) in 2005, and this study aimed to assess satisfaction and attitude of bipolar patientsregarding modified and unmodified electroconvulsive therapy.Methods: A total of 100 patients (50 treated with modified electroconvulsive therapy (M-ECT) and 50treated with unmodified ECT (UM-ECT) with a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder (depressive or manic episode)were invited to participate in this study. Patients with euthymic mood were included.Satisfaction and attitude towards ECT were evaluated with a structured attitude questionnaire, and MECTand UM-ECT patients, and their subgroups (depressive vs. manic) were compared.Results: No significant differences were found between M-ECT and UM-ECT groups regarding age, sex,marital status and occupation. The majority of all patients (78%) were satisfied from treatment withECT and with the outcome (88%), without significant differences between modified and unmodifiedgroups. Forgetfulness (70%) and headaches (57%) occurred in all groups, with the only significant differencein forgetfulness being reported by more manic patients treated with UM-ECT. Depressive andmanic patients treated with UM-ECT reported concerns of brain damage and physical harm significantlymore frequently. While 86% of patients treated with M-ECT consented to a future treatment,this was significantly less in patients treated with UM-ECT (50%).Conclusions: Bipolar patients report a high degree of satisfaction treated either with modified orunmodified ECT but there was a significant difference in perception of adverse effects and willingnessfor receiving ECT in future.