Lika, Idlir
Yükleniyor...
Araştırma projeleri
Organizasyon Birimleri
İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü
Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü araştırma odaklı bir bölüm olarak tasarlanmıştır. Uluslararası öğrenci ve öğretim üyesi sayısı ve çeşitliliği bölümün kimliği ve öğretim pedagojisinin uluslararası bir anlayışla şekillenmesini sağlamaktadır. Müfredat ve ders içerikleri bugünün sorunlarını anlamaya ve geleceğin ihtiyaçlarını karşılamaya yönelik planlanmıştır. Avrupamerkezci bir pedagojinin ötesine geçilerek farklı kültür ve medeniyet birikimleri mukayeseli olarak incelenmektedir. Türkiye’nin karşılaştığı siyasi meseleler bölgesel ve küresel bağlamla etkileşim içerisinde incelenemektedir. Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler’in alt dalları olan Uluslararası İlişkiler, Karşılaştırmalı Siyaset, Siyaset Teorisi ve Türkiye Siyasetine dair dersler müfredat içerisinde yer almaktadır.
Adı Soyadı
Idlir Lika
İlgi Alanları
Government & Law, Area Studies, International Relations, Ethnic Studies, Sociology
Kurumdaki Durumu
Aktif Personel
3 sonuçlar
Arama Sonuçları
Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
Yayın [Book Review]: "First Nationalism then Identity: On Bosnian Muslims and Their Bosniak Identity"(SETA Foundation for Political, Economic, and Social Research, 2023) Lika, Idlir; Lika, Idlir; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler BölümüIn First Nationalism then Identity: On Bosnian Muslims and Their Bosniak Identity, Mirsad Kriještorac undertakes an ambitious exploratory study to test the relationship between two key social science concepts, nationalism, and identity, focusing specifically on how a population’s exposure to elite-driven nationalist projects affects the likelihood of a strong ascription of the elite-desired national identity. Kriještorac is primarily concerned with determining the direction of interaction between nationalism and identity (p. 146) and for that he examines in depth the case of Bosnian Muslims…Yayın [Book Review]: "Varieties of nationalism: Communities, narratives, identities"(Routledge, 2024) Lika, Idlir; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler BölümüIn this short but intriguing and much-needed book, Harris Mylonas and MayaTudor provide a guide and framework for how to conduct rigorous comparativeand cumulative research into the various consequences of nationalism throughtime and across countries. Noting that the nationalism scholarship lacks foremostthe conceptual clarity that characterizes other fields of comparative study likedemocratization (rather surprisingly given nationalism’s enduring relevancearound the world), the authors systematically break down the concept of nation-alism into the five most significant dimensions identified in the literature – “eliteand popular fragmentation of national communities; ascriptiveness and thicknessof national narratives; and salience of national identities” (11) – and review someof the influential works in the literature that causally link each of these dimen-sions with a diverse range of outcomes such as regime type, refugee policies,state capacity, political stability and others. They conclude by encouraging scho-lars to explicitly situate their research puzzle along one of the five identifieddimensions of nationalism (62) and to define and operationalize that dimen-sion(s) “in a clear, consistent manner” (14). Only in this way, the authorscontend, can meaningful comparative and cumulative knowledge in the nation-alism scholarship be built…Yayın Against the odds: Explaining mainstream Montenegrin parties domination of Bosniak and Albanian minority representation in postcommunist Montenegro(Cambridge University Press, 2024) Lika, Idlir; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler BölümüThe Bosniak and Albanian minorities in postcommunist Montenegro have supported and been represented by mainstream Montenegrin parties more than by their ethnic parties. This stands in striking contrast to the situation in neighboring Serbia and North Macedonia where the Bosniak and Albanian minorities vote almost exclusively for their ethnic parties. The Montenegrin case stands out as deviant also when one considers a number of extant explanations, all of which would predict a different outcome. Montenegrin Bosniaks and Albanians constitute two native, sizeable and geographically concentrated minority groups inhabiting a country with an institutional framework and several special electoral arrangements favoring minority parties. Drawing on original data on Bosniak and Albanian legislators elected across 12 parliamentary elections in Montenegro (1990-2023), municipality and country-level parliamentary election results and 12 semi-structured elite interviews, I argue that what explains the deviance in the Montenegrin case is the peculiar nature of Montenegrin identity, specifically the fact that it does not pit the majority against minority, but rather it pits the Montenegrin and Serbian components of the Orthodox majority against each other and in such a context the non-Orthodox minorities become critical political allies of the Montenegrin bloc against the Serbian one.
